To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
This seat on the past was a reliable liberal seat. No more…. the liberals need a 17% swing!
Mick, current polling indicates a swing of at least 10% against Labor. As a result, this seat is still considered ‘potentially winnable’ for the Liberals if they nominate a decent candidate and campaign strongly.
Although I do agree that this margin may be too high to overcome in one election cycle, so I see the current Labor MP hanging on to a marginal seat and then lose in the next election cycle (2029)