Incumbent MPs
- Vica Bayley (Greens), since 2023.1
- Simon Behrakis (Liberal), since 2023.2
- Ella Haddad (Labor), since 2018.
- Kristie Johnston (Independent), since 2021.
- Madeleine Ogilvie (Liberal), since 2019. Previously 2014–2018.
1Bayley filled a casual vacancy caused by the resignation of Cassy O’Connor in August 2023.
2Behrakis filled a casual vacancy caused by the resignation of Elise Archer in October 2023.
Geography
Clark covers the suburbs of Hobart on the western shores of the Derwent River. The seat covers Hobart and Glenorchy LGAs as well as northern parts of Kingborough LGA. The seat includes the Hobart CBD and is by far the most compact seat in Tasmania.
History
The division of Clark was created for the 2021 state election, as a new name for the previous division of Denison.
Denison was first created as a state electorate in 1909, when Tasmania moved to a system of proportional representation with each district electing six members. Denison has always had the same boundaries as the federal electorate of the same name.
The seat first elected four Anti-Socialists and two Labor MPs in 1909. The 1912 election produced an even split of 3 Labor and 3 Liberals, which was maintained at the next four elections. At the 1925 election, the ALP won four out of six seats, as part of the ALP’s first majority government in Tasmania, led by Premier Joseph Lyons.
Denison reverted to a 3-3 split in 1928, before the Nationalists won a 4-2 split as part of their landslide win in 1931. The 1934 election saw the ALP recover and they won 3 seats in Denison, alongside two Nationalists and one independent, George Carruthers, who supported an ALP minority government.
The ALP won a more decisive victory in 1937, which saw 4 Labor MPs elected in Denison. This was maintained in 1941, and an independent won a seat off the ALP in 1946, producing a 3-2-1 split. The 1948 election saw three Labor, one Liberal and two independents win seats in Denison.
One of those independent seats was won back by the Liberal Party in 1950, and the 1955 and 1956 elections saw a result of 3 Labor and 3 Liberal MPs in Denison. These two elections produced identical results where the two parties won three seats each in all five districts. This took place despite the ALP winning approximately 7% more than the Liberals at both elections. This ended with the House of Assembly being increased to thirty-five seats at the 1959, when an independent won the seventh seat in Denison.
The Liberal Party won a 4-3 majority in 1964 and 1969, which helped end the Labor government which ruled Tasmania from 1934 to 1969. Denison’s seventh seat went back to the ALP in 1972, when Labor won a majority in Tasmania, but the ALP government managed to win a majority in 1976 despite the Liberals winning the seventh seat in Denison.
The 1979 election gave the Labor government of Doug Lowe a 20-15 majority, including four seats in Denison. The result, however, was invalidated later in 1979 due to violations of campaign spending laws, and a by-election was held in early 1980, which saw two key events that shaped Tasmanian politics. Along with three Labor and three Liberal MPs, the seventh seat was won by Norm Sanders of the Democrats. In addition, internal conflict in the ALP saw the party’s Left hand out how-to-vote cards putting Deputy Premier Neil Batt fourth on their ticket, which led to the introduction of Robson Rotation.
The 1982 election was a landslide for the Liberal Party, who won a 19-14-2 majority in the House of Assembly. Sole Democrats MP Norm Sanders was re-elected in Denison along with four Liberals and two Labor MPs. This was the only time during the period of Denison electing seven MPs that either major party failed to elect at least three MPs in Denison. Director of the Tasmanian Wilderness Society Dr Bob Brown also won 8% of the vote as an independent.
Sanders resigned from Parliament in late 1982 at the height of the Franklin Dam campaign, and Brown won Sanders’ seat on a countback of votes from the previous election.
At the 1986 election Brown was reelected as a “Green Independent”, alongside three from each of the major parties. This pattern of 3 Labor, 3 Liberal and 1 Green was maintained until the reduction in the size of the House of Assembly in 1998, with Brown being succeeded by Peg Putt in 1993.
After two periods of minority governments with the balance of power being held by the Greens, the Labor and Liberal parties agreed to cut the number of seats at the 1998 election from 35 to 25, with each district electing five MPs. The 1998 election saw the ALP and Liberal Party lose a seat in Denison, with Peg Putt surviving as the only Tasmanian Greens MP.
The 2002 election saw the reelection of the Labor government led by Denison MP Jim Bacon, and it saw the Liberal Party reduced to a sole seat in Denison, alongside one Green and three Labor MPs. This result was maintained at the 2006 election.
In 2010, the ALP lost their third seat, with the Liberal Party regaining a second seat. Labor Premier David Bartlett was re-elected, but his Labor colleagues Lisa Singh and Graeme Sturges both lost their seats, with Scott Bacon winning Labor’s second seat. The Liberal Party’s Michael Hodgman retired, and Elise Archer and Matthew Groom were elected as Liberal MPs.
There was no change in the party split in 2014, although Labor’s Graeme Sturges retired and was succeeded by Madeleine Ogilvie.
The split of two Labor, two Liberal and one Greens was maintained in 2018. Ogilvie lost her seat, but returned to parliament in 2019 upon the retirement of Scott Bacon. Ogilvie subsequently fell out with Labor and sat in the parliament as an independent.
Sue Hickey, was elected as a Liberal MP in 2018, had been elected speaker of the House of Assembly with the support of Labor and Greens members after the election. She subsequently voted against the government on a number of occasions, and she left the Liberal Party in March 2021 after being informed that she would not be preselected for the next election.
Hickey ran an independent ticket, as did Glenorchy mayor Kristie Johnston. The Liberal Party regained their two seats (with Ogilvie winning re-election as a Liberal), and the Greens retained their one seat. Labor retained one of their two seats, while Johnston won the fifth seat.
Candidates
- Labor
- Liberal
- Animal Justice
- Local Network
- Independent
- Greens
- Vica Bayley*
- Helen Burnet
- Trenton Hoare
- Peter Jones
- Janet Shelley
- Nathan Volf
- James Zalotockyj
- Independent
- Shooters, Fishers & Farmers
- Lorraine Bennett
- Adrian Pickin
- Independent
- Ben Lohberger
- Independent
- Ungrouped
- John Michael Forster
- Angela Triffitt
- Stefan Vogel
Assessment
Labor’s performance in Clark in 2021 was very poor. With the expansion of the House they should pick up a second seat, but if they want to form government. Sue Hickey would have likely picked up the seventh seat in 2021 if there had been seven seats, but may not have the same presence after a term out of parliament.
Based on the 2021 voting patterns, the expansion of the Assembly also opens the door for the Greens to win a second seat, or a third Liberal seat.
Candidate | Votes | % | Quota | New quota | Swing |
Elise Archer | 9,402 | 14.7 | 0.8848 | ||
Madeleine Ogilvie | 3,992 | 6.3 | 0.3757 | ||
Simon Behrakis | 3,722 | 5.8 | 0.3503 | ||
Will Coats | 1,690 | 2.7 | 0.1590 | ||
Harvey Lennon | 1,488 | 2.3 | 0.1400 | ||
Liberal Party | 20,294 | 31.8 | 1.9098 | 2.5463 | -5.9 |
Ella Haddad | 7,998 | 12.5 | 0.7527 | ||
Simon Davis | 1,986 | 3.1 | 0.1869 | ||
Chris Clark | 1,597 | 2.5 | 0.1503 | ||
Sam Mitchell | 1,294 | 2.0 | 0.1218 | ||
Deb Carnes | 1,191 | 1.9 | 0.1121 | ||
Australian Labor Party | 14,066 | 22.1 | 1.3237 | 1.7649 | -19.8 |
Cassy O’Connor | 9,469 | 14.9 | 0.8911 | ||
Vica Bayley | 1,372 | 2.2 | 0.1291 | ||
Bec Taylor | 943 | 1.5 | 0.0887 | ||
Tim Smith | 546 | 0.9 | 0.0514 | ||
Nathan Volf | 442 | 0.7 | 0.0416 | ||
Tasmanian Greens | 12,772 | 20.0 | 1.2020 | 1.6025 | +2.5 |
Kristie Johnston | 6,994 | 11.0 | 0.6582 | 0.8775 | +11.0 |
Sue Hickey | 6,261 | 9.8 | 0.5892 | 0.7856 | +9.8 |
Tim Westcott | 902 | 1.4 | 0.0849 | ||
Animal Justice Party | 902 | 1.4 | 0.0849 | 0.1132 | +1.4 |
Andrew Large | 588 | 0.9 | 0.0553 | ||
Lorraine Bennett | 310 | 0.5 | 0.0292 | ||
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers | 898 | 1.4 | 0.0845 | 0.1127 | -0.4 |
Justin Stringer | 154 | 0.2 | 0.0145 | ||
Federation Party | 154 | 0.2 | 0.0145 | 0.0193 | +0.2 |
Mike Dutta | 615 | 1.0 | 0.0579 | ||
Jax Ewin | 537 | 0.8 | 0.0505 | ||
Lisa Gershwin | 260 | 0.4 | 0.0245 | ||
Total Others | 1,412 | 2.2 | 0.1329 | 0.1772 | +2.2 |
Informal | 3,378 | 5.0 | 0.0000 |
Preference flows
No candidate polled a full quota in their own right. The Greens’ Cassy O’Connor managed to reach a quota relatively early in the count, followed by Liberal Elise Archer.
Let’s fast forward to the stage right after the distribution of Archer’s (very small) surplus. There were eight candidates remaining: three Labor, two Liberals, one Green and two independents:
-
-
- Ella Haddad (ALP) – 0.896 quotas
- Kristie Johnston (IND) – 0.732
- Sue Hickey (IND) – 0.658
- Madeleine Ogilvie (LIB) – 0.496
- Simon Behrakis (LIB) – 0.458
- Simon Davis (ALP) – 0.262
- Vica Bayley (GRN) – 0.258
- Chris Clark (ALP) – 0.227
-
Clark’s preferences mostly favoured the other independents, bringing Haddad close to a majority:
-
-
- Haddad (ALP) – 0.982
- Johnston (IND) – 0.738
- Hickey (IND) – 0.666
- Ogilvie (LIB) – 0.500
- Behrakis (LIB) – 0.461
- Davis (ALP) – 0.377
- Bayley (GRN) – 0.260
-
Preferences from the second Greens candidate elected Haddad and particularly boosted the two independents:
-
-
- Haddad (ALP) – 1.042
- Johnston (IND) – 0.806
- Hickey (IND) – 0.710
- Ogilvie (LIB) – 0.505
- Behrakis (LIB) – 0.466
- Davis (ALP) – 0.391
-
Haddad’s surplus unsurprisingly flowed strongly to Davis but wasn’t enough to get him out of last place:
-
-
- Johnston (IND) – 0.811
- Hickey (IND) – 0.714
- Ogilvie (LIB) – 0.506
- Behrakis (LIB) – 0.467
- Davis (ALP) – 0.432
-
Davis’ preferences favoured Johnston and Hickey:
-
-
- Johnston (IND) – 0.917
- Hickey (IND) – 0.798
- Ogilvie (LIB) – 0.526
- Behrakis (LIB) – 0.494
-
Behrakis was knocked out, and his preferences pushed Ogilvie into the lead.
-
-
- Ogilvie (LIB) – 0.955
- Johnston (IND) – 0.938
- Hickey (IND) – 0.820
-
This left three candidates running for two seats, so Hickey missed out, falling short by a margin of 0.118 quotas or 1,254 votes.
Booths have been divided into four areas. Most of the population of Clark lie in Glenorchy and Hobart local government areas. Booths in Glenorchy have been split between Claremont (north) and Glenorchy (south). Booths in Hobart have been divided between Hobart and South. The handful of booths in Kingborough council have also been included in South.
There is a strong divide in the vote between the Glenorchy and Hobart council areas. Labor does much better in Glenorchy and the Greens do much better in Hobart. Johnston also does better in Glenorchy.
The Liberal Party had the highest primary vote, ranging from 24.8% in Hobart to 36.3% in the south.
Labor’s primary vote ranged from 13.5% in the south to 29.9% in Claremont.
The Greens came third, with a primary vote ranging from 8.3% in Claremont to 29.9% in Hobart.
Independent candidate Kristie Johnston’s vote ranged from 8.5% in the south to about 13.5% in Glenorchy and Claremont. Sue Hickey’s primary vote ranged from 7.5% in Claremont to 10.9% in the south.
Voter group | LIB | ALP | GRN | Johnston | Hickey | Total votes | % of votes |
Hobart | 24.8 | 20.2 | 29.9 | 10.2 | 8.9 | 14,065 | 20.1 |
Glenorchy | 29.3 | 29.7 | 13.3 | 13.5 | 8.5 | 10,232 | 14.6 |
South | 36.3 | 13.5 | 26.5 | 8.5 | 10.9 | 9,835 | 14.1 |
Claremont | 34.3 | 29.9 | 8.3 | 13.6 | 7.5 | 6,515 | 9.3 |
Pre-poll | 34.8 | 20.8 | 16.9 | 12.0 | 11.7 | 12,595 | 18.0 |
Other votes | 34.5 | 21.8 | 18.4 | 9.0 | 10.5 | 10,511 | 15.0 |
Election results in Clark at the 2021 Tasmanian election
Toggle between primary votes for the Liberal Party, Labor Party, the Greens, independent candidate Kristie Johnston and independent candidate Sue Hickey.
i know its scheduled for after the election do too how close it is to the election but given the enrolment for clark is under quota and lyons is over transferring the Upper Derwent River region from Lyons to Clark should solve the deviation problem.
sry i meant to say Derwent Valley Council LGA
My current seat. Labor’s vote will rebound now they have Josh Willie on the ticket who I suspect will get a quota in his own right. Easily two seats but not sure about three. Kristie Johnston will probably also get a quota in her own right. Liberals should get two seats but I think three will be a challenge especially with Sue Hickey running again. Greens have selected the Hobart deputy mayor as a second candidate and she’s the most high profile Green from Clark that isn’t a current or past MP. Hickey has a good chance especially as she’s now Glenorchy deputy mayor but could just miss out.
Prediction: either 2 LIB, 2 LAB, 1 GRN, 2 IND (Johnston and Hickey) or 2 LIB, 2 LAB, 2 GRN, 1 IND (Johnston)
The thought of the Liberals and Greens getting the exact same number of seats is odd, but not impossible.
I do realise that there’s a competitive field of independents along with a natural three-way contest. This could squeeze the primary votes from the big three parties. Hobart is small but it has a huge Greens vote for a smallish city and a relatively high Liberal vote for a capital city CBD.
When you consider some past election results, it’s not that unthinkable.
In 2002 the Greens outpolled the Liberals in Denison (22.9% Liberal vs. 24.5% Green) and it was close in 2006 (26.5% vs. 24%) and 2010 (29.8% vs. 24.9%). Just from looking at the primaries of Labor, Liberal and Greens for each of those elections and it looks like 4 Labor, 2 Green, 1 Liberal in 2002, 3 Labor, 2 Liberal and 2 Green in 2006 and 3 Labor, 2 Liberal and 2 Green in 2010. It hasn’t been close at all since the Liberals won government, but now with the possibility that they’ll lose government their primaries could be similar again.
Will wait until nominations have closed before making another prediction but I still expect Hickey to beat the Greens for the final seat.
I think the chocolate fountain will be a vote winner. As someone who has bpnever been to lassie or wanted to I would go. Good tourism boost
Everyone, this isn’t a joke. There will actually be the world’s largest chocolate fountain in Tasmania if the Liberals are re-elected.
Sources: https://amp.theguardian.com/australia-news/live/2024/mar/10/australia-news-live-heatwave-bushfires-victoria-anthony-albanese-peter-dutton-chris-bowen-fuel-standards https://pulsetasmania.com.au/news/100-million-chocolate-experience-with-worlds-largest-chocolate-fountain-planned-for-hobart/ https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/03/10/worlds-largest-chocolate-fountain-planned-for-tasmania/
How many more valuable Community services are facing the axe and uncertainty if the Liberals win again in 2024?
Programs that support low income earners and people in our communities deemed to experience disadvantage. Are once again at risk while the private enterprises like RACT get the Government nod, that appear to replace pre existing and experienced program services with proven track records? The RACT driver education is said to be aimed only at 16-19 year old’s and what happens to the people over 19 years of age needing that support? If a Peak body advocating for these programs is put at funding risk then those programs reliant on the peak body become more vulnerable than ever!
The community doesn’t need private enterprise made the replacement for any Peak body, as private business has a different agenda to a community based Peak body.
Until the recent lack of action towards us or lack of contact from Labor or follow up to contact emails by any party Anyone of them that stood up for all Tasmanians equally at risk of losing an essential community service provider or at the very least that provider being slashed so hard. That they can barely function and meet funding performance criteria. Is frustrating and to think I would hosted 3 yard signs on the fence, my vote is at stake? How is it that election after election in Tasmania flows like this?
For me the evidence of anyone’s character is based on their past actions. How much more lack of action evidence do Tasmanians need before they decide to make a change in Government
Any Government that promises the same thing year and year election after election as we have seen for the last 10 years is not planning to change that behaviour. The exploding budget for an AFL stadium over essential services and promises of gigantic chocolate fountains is proof enough to finish me! I do not want to hear abut promise after promise like many other Tasmanians I want to see it.
I live in a Council area where I have been forced to live with the actions brought about by 2 independents, On a road and have road frontage that could hold 3 party signs. But as we went into this election the sign I received when I asking for support after contacting the Politicians from 2023, then again weeks prior to the election and again after the election was called means the fence will remain bare.
I wont be advertising anyone now and the vote I felt was assured is not certain any longer.
I am shocked and in disbelief that so many people talk of wasting their votes, not voting and then complaining when the rest of Tasmania finds it’s self governed. By a Government with a proven track record of broken promises, slashed or ceased community program funding? What will it take to evoke action and change in this State. Health services, housing, community programs are hurting and struggling to provide essential services to out community members and instead of getting better. I am watching the exploding stadium budgets while people living at grass roots level cannot meet the basic costs of living due to rapidly exploding CPI and fuel excise costs…. The Government can do something about fuel excise why haven’t they? Many people once invested in voting for the major parties here, are saying they have flipped and will vote independent. So who can win is anyone’s guess now?
This seat is probably the hardest the predict. Labor’s vote cratered at the last election and should pick up, The Greens are in the ball park for a second seat but it remains to be seen if that will transpire. The Libs will probably have a swing against them and I can’t see them winning a third seat. Johnson should be relatively safe and it’s hard to assess how Hickey will go, although she is the deputy mayor of Glenorchy where she polled weakest at the last election.
My prediction is 2 Lib, 2 Labor, 1 Green, Johnson and the last seat between the Greens and Hickey, potentially Labor.
The chocolate fountain thing is a bit of a joke imo and just feels like another announcement/policy they’ve thrown out there in desparation for votes. But anecdotally the reactions seemed to be more mixed so remains to be seen if it’ll be a vote winner or not.
I still stand by my previous prediction of the final seat going to either Sue Hickey or Helen Burnet (Greens). Labor’s primary has ranged from 23 to 29 statewide, with Clark breakdowns having Labor at 30, 29.23 and 24 respectively. I think Labor would need more than 30 to be certain of a third seat. The Greens having chosen Helen Burnet is the best choice and I think their strategy of having both appear on signs together throughout the electorate could work.
My guess of the primaries is roughly 27 Labor, 24 Liberal, 20 Greens, 14 Johnston, 9 Hickey with the remainder going to minor parties and the other independents.
I’ve been seeing a lot of election ads on YouTube. The most common one I’ve seen is the Greens ads, with Labor not far behind. I’ve seen a few Liberal ones, particularly the traffic light coalition ad. I’ve seen candidate ads for Simon Behrakis as well as Labor candidate Stuart Benson.
Could see Benson being Labor’s third highest polling candidate this time.
It’s unfair that the big parties have huge budgets to woo voters. Makes it impossible for decent independents to be heard. There should at least be a cap on advertising budgets.
@Zachary – The thing about the chocolate fountain reminds of the previous NSW election, where Daly and Gladys turned up to an ‘uncommitted voters’ town hall at Penrith. The media class had made the Libs plan to knock down and rebuild the SFS a big issue in the election, so when David Speers asked the audience if they agreed with the rebuild and about 80 of the 100 put their hands up, you could see the look of disbelief on Speers and Daly’s face. I mention this only to point out that sometimes something which seems so obviously a negative amongst those who frequent a blog such as this is can actually be neutral or even a positive amongst the broader community.
Some thoughts on election eve
Liberals: I think they should be safe for two seats. Simon Behrakis will poll the highest of the Liberals now that he’s an incumbent and yet again he is spending a lot. Madeline Ogilvie should be able to win the second seat but Marcus Vermey’s name is eveywhere so he’s a wild card for the second Liberal. Hard to see a path to three seats in Clark.
Labor: Josh Willie should boost the Labor vote and he and Ella Haddad will be elected. A third seems a stretch. If they did get a third I’d expect Simon Davis (2021 state and 2022 federal candidate) or Stuart Benson (seen a few YouTube ads + very prominent in my part of the electorate.
Greens: Having Vica Bayley as a lower profile incumbent compared to Cassy O’Connor + the high profile Helen Burnet will help them get two here. Most signs I’ve seen have had both of them on it which seems like a good strategy. I think they have a good shot at two seats but will have a lot of competition.
Others: Kristie Johnston could get elected on primaries. I don’t see her having an issue. Sue Hickey has a good chance too although I’m not sure if she’ll have a swing against due to not having been an MP for three years. Louise Elliot is high profile but a polarising figure. I’ve seen quite a few of her signs but I only expect her to poll about 1%. Elliot might win over some conservative Liberal voters but the Liberal ticket is conservative anyway.
My prediction is 2-2-1-0-2
less likely
2-2-2-0-1
2-3-1-0-1
3-2-1-0-1
Definitely Liberals 2 and Labor 2 and Greens 1 and Independent 1 – the last seat is a lottery.
This looks like a contest between Labor and Independents and the Greens. I tip the Independents, mainly Johnston and Hickey, to draw votes from the established parties, but I doubt that they’ll both get elected – I see either of them getting in but not both of them. Similarly, despite good support for the Greens, they’ll lose plenty of votes, especially with former leader O’Connor gone. They’ll get either Bayley or Hobart deputy mayor Burnet elected but not both of them. I tip Labor to sneak home here, for a final tally of 3.
I’m shocked that Sue Hickey polled so badly and I wonder if the late announcement really harmed her campaign. I overestimated how well Johnston would do, it does look like she has a lot of soft voters and that could cause her an issue in future election. The Greens strategy here really was brilliant and they didn’t even have that big a swing, just really good second candidate choice and a campaign that took advantage of that. Labor would be happy they’ve made progress on recovering their vote here from the disastrous result in 2021 but they still have a lot of work to do. Also surprised Simon Davis didn’t do as well as expected.