IND 13.7% vs LIB
Incumbent MP
Alex Greenwich, since 2012.
- Geography
- Redistribution
- History
- Candidate summary
- Assessment
- 2019 results
- Booth breakdown
- Results maps
Central Sydney. The seat of Sydney mainly covers parts of the City of Sydney, as well as parts of the neighbouring Woollahra and Randwick local government areas. It covers the Sydney CBD and the suburbs of Pyrmont, Darlinghurst, Potts Point, Woolloomooloo, Paddington, Surry Hills, Woollahra and parts of Edgecliff and Ultimo.
Redistribution
Sydney expanded to the south, taking in the remainder of Surry Hills from Newtown, and Moore Park and Centennial Park from Heffron. Sydney also lost part of Edgecliff to Vaucluse. The estimated independent margin has grown from 11.8% to 13.7%. The redistribution also shifted the two-party-preferred margin from 3% Liberal to 0.8% Labor.
History
The current electoral district of Sydney was only created in 2007, replacing the abolished seat of Bligh.
The original Legislative Assembly had four members elected representing the City of Sydney. In 1859 the seat was split into the two districts of East Sydney and West Sydney. Each district elected four members, and were the most prestigious districts in the colony. Leading political figures would contest these seats, and if they failed to win them, they would then move on to another district, as elections were not all held on the same day.
The 1894 election was the first where all MLAs were elected in single-member districts. The former multi-member districts of South Sydney, East Sydney and West Sydney were broken up into ten districts, all of which had “Sydney” in their name, along with the name of a significant figure in early NSW (Bligh, Phillip, Cook, Gipps, Lang, Flinders, Fitzroy, Denison).
From 1904, the word “Sydney” was dropped, but there continued to be numerous seats in the area now covered by Sydney. The 1904 seats included Pyrmont, Darling Harbour, Surry Hills, Belmore, Darlinghurst, Paddington and King (which covered the CBD itself).
Throughout this period, most of these seats reliably elected Labor candidates. In 1920, the multi-member district of Sydney was created, covering a similar area as the current seat, stretching from Pyrmont/Ultimo to Paddington. The seat elected a majority of Labor MPs for all three elections, but it was abolished in 1927, being replaced by a number of inner-city seats.
By the 1970s, the area only included three seats. The seat of King covered the CBD and stretched west to cover Glebe and Newtown. The seat of Phillip stretched from Surry Hills to Rosebery. The seat of Bligh covered Paddington and Kings Cross.
The 1973 election reduced the number of seats to two. King was abolished, and Phillip moved up to cover Redfern, Glebe, Ultimo and the city centre.
For the 1981, election, Phillip was renamed Elizabeth, and Bligh shifted closer to the city centre. The new boundaries saw the ALP’s Fred Miller win Bligh. He only held it for one term, losing in 1984 to the Liberal Party’s Michael Yabsley.
In 1988, Yabsley was challenged in Bligh by City of Sydney councillor Clover Moore. She had been elected to South Sydney Council in 1980. The council was merged with the City of Sydney in 1981, and she was elected to the new council. Moore was the favourite to win the next Lord Mayoral election when the ALP state government sacked the City of Sydney council in 1987. She then decided to run for the seat of Bligh as an independent, and defeated the sitting member Yabsley.
Not long after the 1988 election, Liberal Member for Vaucluse Ray Aston died, and Yabsley won his seat at the following by-election. He immediately became a minister in the Coalition government. He moved to the backbench in 1992 and resigned in 1994.
Meanwhile, in 1988 the seat covering the CBD and western parts of the City of Sydney was again renamed as McKell. This seat, whatever the name, had been held by the ALP continuously for decades. The seat of Phillip had been won in 1954 by Lord Mayor of Sydney Pat Hills. He became a minister in 1959, and Deputy Premier in 1964. He served as Leader of the Opposition from 1968 until 1973, when he was succeeded by Neville Wran. When Phillip was renamed Elizabeth in 1981 he won the new seat, and retired in 1988.
The again-renamed seat of McKell was won by Sandra Nori, also of the ALP. In 1991, McKell was merged with Balmain to form the new seat of Port Jackson, which stretched from Leichhardt and Balmain to Potts Point and Woolloomooloo. Nori held the seat from 1991 until her retirement in 2007. She served as a minister from 1999 to 2007.
Clover Moore continued to win Bligh throughout the 1990s. In the 1991 parliament she was a number of independent MPs to support the Coalition government in minority. She won re-election in 1991, 1995, 1999 and 2003.
In 2004, the ALP state government merged the City of Sydney and the City of South Sydney together just before the local government elections, much as they had done 23 years earlier. The ALP expected that strong Labor-voting areas in South Sydney would allow Labor to gain control of Sydney Town Hall, and ran former federal minister Michael Lee. Clover Moore ran for Lord Mayor and won a solid victory, with a number of her supporters elected to the City of Sydney council. She won re-election in 2008.
The 2007 redistribution redrew the central Sydney electorates substantially. Port Jackson was split between the seat of Balmain, which covered everything west of Glebe, and the seat of Sydney. Sydney covers the city centre and much of Moore’s former seat of Bligh. Cr Moore moved to the new seat, and won re-election for a sixth term in the Legislative Assembly with relative ease.
At the 2011 election, the Liberal Party gained a substantial swing, increasing their primary vote by 14%. Clover Moore, Labor and the Greens also suffered swings. Labor fell from third place to fourth place on primary votes. Labor had come second after preferences in 2007, but the Liberal Party replaced them in that position in 2011. Clover Moore’s margin fell from 16.6% against Labor in 2007 to 3.1% against the Liberal Party in 2011.
The new Coalition government moved to prohibit the arrangement whereby Clover Moore served as both Lord Mayor and as Member for Sydney. Legislation was passed in 2012 prohibiting sitting MPs from running for council elections, which would allow councillors to shift to Parliament, but would not allow councillors who are MPs to run for re-election. Moore resigned from Sydney in late 2012 to nominate for a third term as Lord Mayor.
The ensuing 2012 by-election was won by independent candidate Alex Greenwich, who was closely aligned with Moore. Greenwich was re-elected in 2015 and 2019.
Assessment
Sydney is a safe seat for Alex Greenwich.
Candidate | Party | Votes | % | Swing | Redist |
Alex Greenwich | Independent | 17,905 | 41.4 | +1.8 | 36.6 |
Lyndon Gannon | Liberal | 13,089 | 30.3 | -2.5 | 28.2 |
Jo Holder | Labor | 6,370 | 14.7 | 0.0 | 16.2 |
Jonathan Harms | Greens | 4,124 | 9.5 | -0.2 | 13.3 |
Fiona Douskou | Small Business | 1,017 | 2.4 | +2.4 | 2.4 |
Christopher Thomas | Sustainable Australia | 696 | 1.6 | +1.6 | 1.7 |
Others | 1.7 | ||||
Informal | 807 | 1.8 |
2019 two-candidate-preferred result
Candidate | Party | Votes | % | Swing | Redist |
Alex Greenwich | Independent | 22,841 | 61.8 | +3.7 | 63.7 |
Lyndon Gannon | Liberal | 14,134 | 38.2 | -3.7 | 36.3 |
2019 two-party-preferred result
Candidate | Party | Votes | % | Swing | Redist |
Jo Holder | Labor | 14,444 | 47.0 | +3.7 | 50.8 |
Lyndon Gannon | Liberal | 16,259 | 53.0 | -3.7 | 49.2 |
Booths in Sydney have been split into four parts: City, Darlinghurst, Paddington and Surry Hills.
Greenwich won the two-candidate-preferred vote in all four areas, ranging from 58.5% in the city to 77.1% in Surry Hills (although this doesn’t include the southern parts of Surry Hills previously contained in Newtown, which are likely to be strong areas for Greenwich).
Labor came third, with a primary vote ranging from 13.3% in the city to 20.3% in Surry Hills.
Voter group | ALP prim | IND 2CP | Total votes | % of votes |
Darlinghurst | 14.5 | 71.6 | 9,218 | 19.5 |
Surry Hills | 20.3 | 77.1 | 6,302 | 13.3 |
Paddington | 13.8 | 59.2 | 5,198 | 11.0 |
City | 13.3 | 58.5 | 4,985 | 10.5 |
Other votes | 17.1 | 58.3 | 15,756 | 33.3 |
Pre-poll | 16.3 | 62.4 | 5,907 | 12.5 |
Election results in Sydney at the 2019 NSW state election
Toggle between two-candidate-preferred votes (Independent vs Liberal), two-party-preferred votes and primary votes for independent candidate Alex Greenwich, the Liberal Party, Labor and the Greens.
Are the booths that come out in favour for the Libs in the Lib vs Labor TPP usually as this strong for the Libs in federal elections. I know Paddington is in Wnetworth and from memory is decent for the Libs but i think favours the independents recently but what about the Millers Point and Pyrmont booth. If so Millers Point is interesting, it’s in the federal seat of Sydney, in which The Libs finished third on primary votes and is in a seat with a 75-25 TPP for Labor yet voted 75-25 for Lib in 2018.
There’s no TPP for Lib vs Alp for the Millers Point booth on pollbludger as it was a ALP vs Greens contest but the Lib primary dropped 14.4% to 43.4% compared to ALP up by 6.3% to 37.5% and Greens up 7% to 12.9%.
IND retain, But I SUSPECT Labor will finally win the TPP against the Libs here because of recent events federally and the way the Libs have been going for the past few years.
The Greens or Labor could win this once Greenwich retires, the Labor and Greens vote would be much hire in absence of independents which has never occurred in this seat since its incarnation in 1988.
It’s staggering how great the switch in primary vote is between Greenwich and the Greens, between the northern and southern parts of Surry Hills.
@Wilson
That’s because the southern part of Surrey Hills was in Newtown district at the last election. Greenwich should perform very strongly in these areas this time – in fact he made a suggestion to the redistribution panel asking for the remainder of Surrey Hills to be transferred to Sydney.
South of Foveux St, Surry Hills used to be in the electorate of Newtown. The “Independent” vote down there was really for Keep Sydney Open and other minor parties.
I expect a drop in the Greens vote and sharp rise in Alex Greenwich’s vote at the election in this neck of the woods.
Who do folks think Greenwich will support in a hung parliament?
Daniel, I believe Greenwich will back Labor as he holds progressive views being an advocate for same sex marriage. Also, the district is naturally left leaning so he would be inclined to back a party/government that shares his views and the views of his constituents.
Although it is different now, Sydney has generally been unfriendly to Labor. Greenwich politically is aligned with ‘the left’ in the parliament but not really the Labor party, and may opt to back a Kean-led Coalition even. But that would never feasibly happen when there are other sources of supply.
I agree that Greenwich is progressive and left-wing but it doesn’t mean he’ll support Labor. Supporting either side would undermine his ‘independence’.
The low primary vote for Labor and the Greens isn’t because they are unpopular but because their voters vote tactically, or so it appears. I won’t say that Labor is unpopular here. Based on federal results, this area should be safe Labor.
I believe Greenwich could get away with supporting a minority Labor government since over 95% of his base are normally Labor or Green voters. I’m also pretty sure Greenwich is not a fiscal conservative and as a result, he wouldn’t support any minority Liberal government. On the other hand, NSW Labor would be too “conservative” for him so he continues status quo.
Agree Votante, was more talking about Sydney while Greenwich is still on the ballot paper
Greenwich is to the left of the liberals as is his base of support. To support the liberals in govt would cause him to lose his seat. He relies on the same base of support as did Clover Moore. This seat in the absence of his canditure would be I think green held.
What surprises me is that Labor wouldn’t hold this seat as shown on the traditional TTP with this seat now narrowly with the redistribution making it notionally Labor. I’ve seen some comments above saying this seat should be safe Labor due to the federal seat of Sydney is safe, I would say that the buffer on the federal seat is inflated due to the popular Local member of the seat & when Tanya retires I expect the seat to not be as safe as it is now.
There are pockets in the seat for both the state and federal electorates where the Libs were doing relatively well in like Pyrmont, Miller’s Point and the Sydney CBD. With the shift towards right wing populism and renewed emphasis social conservatism by the federal Libs, the Lib vote in these areas will get progressively worse just like in Southbank, Docklands, Albert Park and South Yarra in Melbourne. This will be to the detriment of Labor especially when Tanya retires unless the Libs decide to preference the Greens ahead. For the state electorate, it’s a bit more complicated due to Greenwich and the more pragmatic and less ideological NSW Libs.
Agree Dan M, i would also add Centennial Park (similar to East Melbourne) and Paddington are better for the Libs. We can compare Oxford Street to Chapel Street. I would say Sydney CBD is probably more affluent than Melbourne CBD due better natural geography such as Harbour views (more penthouses etc). In Melbourne, i would say comparable areas would be Southbank/St Kilda Road area where you see much greater wealth/penthouses etc than in the actual CBD. The NSW Libs are the closest to a traditional liberal party where they still have a lot of support from the wealthy and educated.
@Bob Greenwich does “just vote 1” HTVs. If he directed preferences I suspect ALP would easily win the 2PP.
Greenwich will be relected here. He is left of centre and would support a alp govt in a minority situation. For him to be reelected he cannot side with the liberals. I also suspect he would have no intention of backing the liberals any way
Hmm Mick. Obviously you haven’t spoken with Greenwich. Don’t assume anything old son – it makes and ass of you and I!!!
I am sure he cannot be reelected if he supports a liberal govt
His electorate is very left of centre. I did some rough sums notionally allocating his preferences in a theoretical Labor liberal match up and I get 60/40 or better labor’s way
https://antonygreen.com.au/electoral-pendulum-for-the-2023-nsw-election/
Antony Green seems to give Labor a 0.5% margin vs Liberals in Sydney (assuming I’m reading that right).
Obviously this could be distorted by Greenwich taking votes from Labor and Greens so those two parties are artificially low, but it doesn’t seem on paper to be the rock-solid Labor seat some are claiming.
While it is true that Libs margins are high despite being in the inner city compared to Melbourne, The Libs did more poorly on the Federal Level in the same voting booths. Some of it is due to the State’s TPP results for the State and Federal elections but another factor could be NSW Libs choose always moderate candidates where it fits in with the seat, unlike Fed Libs.
the only issue with redistribution is its basically guess work as just because someone votes at a particular booth doesnt mean they actually live in the area that booth is now in. also its usually based on projetions as they dont ount every single votes preferences they just use data on approx