Incumbent Senators
Term due to expire 2025 | Term due to expire 2028 |
Slade Brockman (Liberal) | Michaelia Cash (Liberal) |
Varun Ghosh (Labor)1 | Dorinda Cox (Greens) |
Matt O’Sullivan (Liberal) | Sue Lines (Labor) |
Louise Pratt (Labor) | Fatima Payman (Independent)2 |
Linda Reynolds (Liberal) | Dean Smith (Liberal) |
Jordon Steele-John (Greens) | Glenn Sterle (Labor) |
1Varun Ghosh replaced Pat Dodson on 1 February 2024 following Dodson’s resignation.
2Fatima Payman resigned from the Labor Party on 4 July 2024 to become an independent.
History
Western Australian Senate races were dominated by the Coalition from 1951 until the beginning of the 1980s. The 1951 election produced a result of four ALP senators, four Liberal senators and two Country Party senators. The 1953 election saw the ALP win a seat off the Country Party, but the previous result was restored in 1955. The 4-4-2 result was maintained at every election throughout the 1950s and 1960s. The 1970 Senate election saw the Liberal Party lose one of its four seats to independent Syd Negus, who was elected on a platform of abolishing death duties.
The 1974 double dissolution saw Negus defeated and the Country Party lose one of its two seats. The result saw five Labor senators alongside four Liberals and one Country senator. The 1975 double dissolution saw the Coalition regain its majority in Western Australia, with the ALP losing its fifth senate seat to the Liberals. The 1977 election saw the National Country Party lose its senate seat to the Liberals, producing a result of six Liberals and four Labor senators.
The 1983 double dissolution saw the Liberals lose their majority, with five Liberals, four Labor and one Democrat elected. The 1984 election saw Labor gain both new Senate seats while the Democrats lost their seat. In addition to 6 ALP and 5 Liberal, the Nuclear Disarmament Party’s Jo Vallentine was elected. At the 1987 double dissolution, Vallentine was re-elected as an independent along with a Democrat and five each for the two major parties.
The 1990 election saw the Liberals win six seats, along with five Labor and the re-elected Vallentine, who was re-elected as a Green. The Liberals have maintained six WA seats ever since. The 1993 election saw the Greens win a second seat off the ALP. From 1993 until today, WA has been represented by six Liberals, four Labor senators and two minor party Senators from the Greens or Democrats.
In 1996, the Greens lost one of their seats to the Democrats, losing their other seat in 1998. The Democrats held onto their seat in 2001 before losing one of their seats in 2004. The last Democrat was defeated by the Greens candidate in 2007.
The 2010 election was a status quo result. It was the third election in a row which saw three Liberals, two Labor and one Green elected.
The 2013 election produced a bizarre result, where a tiny vote margin between two nonviable candidates decided whether two seats would go to the Palmer United Party and Labor, or the Greens and the Australian Sports Party. A recount reversed the result, but also saw a large batch of ballot papers go missing, forcing a re-election.
At the 2014 re-election, large swings to the Greens and the Palmer United Party saw both parties win one seat each, with the Liberal Party retaining their three seats and Labor limping in with only one seat.
There were two changes at the 2016 double dissolution. Labor recovered their fourth seat, while the Liberal Party dropped from six to five. The Greens maintained their two seats. The Palmer United Party lost their sole seat, with One Nation winning a single seat.
The Liberal Party regained their third seat (for a total of six) at the 2019 election, with One Nation losing their sole seat. There was no change for Labor or the Greens.
The 2022 election was a strong one for the left in Western Australia. Labor won three seats in the state for the first time ever at a six-seat Senate election. They managed to do so not by defeating another left party for the third seat, but by winning a seat off the right. Labor won three seats along with two Liberals and one Green. This was crucial in producing a progressive majority in the Senate.
Group | Votes | % | Swing | Quota |
Labor | 527,319 | 34.6 | +7.0 | 2.4187 |
Liberal | 483,364 | 31.7 | -9.2 | 2.2171 |
Greens | 217,571 | 14.3 | +2.5 | 0.9979 |
One Nation | 53,260 | 3.5 | -2.4 | 0.2443 |
Legalise Cannabis | 51,568 | 3.4 | +1.7 | 0.2365 |
Australian Christians | 33,143 | 2.2 | +0.5 | 0.1520 |
United Australia | 32,543 | 2.1 | +0.4 | 0.1493 |
Liberal Democrats | 29,511 | 1.9 | +1.2 | 0.1354 |
Western Australia Party | 26,555 | 1.7 | +0.5 | 0.1218 |
Great Australian Party | 15,958 | 1.0 | +1.0 | 0.0732 |
Animal Justice | 14,186 | 0.9 | -0.1 | 0.0651 |
Federation Party | 8,339 | 0.5 | +0.5 | 0.0382 |
Others | 32,806 | 2.1 | 0.1505 | |
Informal | 45,776 | 2.9 |
Preference flows
Four seats were won on primary votes: two for the Liberal Party and two for Labor. The Greens fell just a few hundred votes short of a quota on primary votes, and won the fifth seat relatively early in the count.
We can now fast forward to the last ten candidates contesting the last seat, with none of them close to a quota:
- Fatima Payman (ALP) – 0.4415 quotas
- Nicola Johnson (LGC) – 0.2628
- Paul Filing (ON) – 0.2627
- Ben Small (LIB) – 0.2253
- Mike Crichton (CHR) – 0.1612
- James McDonald (UAP) – 0.1609
- Kate Fantinel (LDP) – 0.1459
- Matthew McDowall (WAP) – 0.1459
- Rod Culleton (GAP) – 0.0970
- Amanda Dorn (AJP) – 0.0864
AJP preferences flowed to Legalise Cannabis, Labor and the Western Australia Party:
- Payman (ALP) – 0.4603
- Johnson (LGC) – 0.2878
- Filing (ON) – 0.2675
- Small (LIB) – 0.2327
- Crichton (CHR) – 0.1633
- McDonald (UAP) – 0.1630
- Fantinel (LDP) – 0.1486
- McDowall (WAP) – 0.1606
- Culleton (GAP) – 0.1005
One Nation did best out of preferences from Culleton, who had previously been elected as a One Nation senator:
- Payman (ALP) – 0.4637
- Johnson (LGC) – 0.3022
- Filing (ON) – 0.2967
- Small (LIB) – 0.2350
- McDonald (UAP) – 0.1797
- McDowall (WAP) – 0.1700
- Crichton (CHR) – 0.1674
- Fantinel (LDP) – 0.1655
Liberal Democrats preferences favoured the Liberal Party primarily, but One Nation managed to overtake Legalise Cannabis:
- Payman (ALP) – 0.4891
- Filing (ON) – 0.3259
- Johnson (LGC) – 0.3166
- Small (LIB) – 0.2800
- McDonald (UAP) – 0.1964
- McDowall (WAP) – 0.1838
- Crichton (CHR) – 0.1753
Australian Christians preferences favoured the Liberal and One Nation candidates
- Payman (ALP) – 0.5175
- Filing (ON) – 0.3718
- Small (LIB) – 0.3315
- Johnson (LGC) – 0.3228
- McDonald (UAP) – 0.2170
- McDowall (WAP) – 0.1990
Western Australia Party preferences favoured the major parties:
- Payman (ALP) – 0.5620
- Filing (ON) – 0.3980
- Small (LIB) – 0.3821
- Johnson (LGC) – 0.3553
- McDonald (UAP) – 0.2312
United Australia preferences overwhelmingly flowed to One Nation, bringing One Nation as close as they got to Labor through this count:
- Payman (ALP) – 0.5949
- Filing (ON) – 0.5258
- Small (LIB) – 0.4036
- Johnson (LGC) – 0.3787
Legalise Cannabis preferences tended to scatter, but Labor did best out of them:
- Payman (ALP) – 0.7117
- Filing (ON) – 0.6106
- Small (LIB) – 0.4556
Liberal preferences split roughly equally, slightly favouring Labor while quite a lot exhausted:
- Payman (ALP) – 0.8531
- Filing (ON) – 0.7454
Labor’s Payman won the final seat by a margin of 0.1077 quotas, or about 23,500 votes.
- A – Rodney Cullerton (Great Australian Party)
- B – Steve Klomp (Australian Christians)
- C – Aisha Nancy Novakovich (Citizens Party)
- D – Melissa Bannister (Trumpet of Patriots)
- E – Karen Oborn (Sustainable Australia)
- F – Elana Mitchell (Democrats)
- G – Ryan Burns (Libertarian)
- H – Madison King (People First)
- I – Jordon Steele-John (Greens)
- J – Tian Carrie-Wilson (Fusion)
- K – Jade Sobieralski (Socialist Alliance)
- L – Labor
- Ellie Whiteaker
- Varun Ghosh
- Deep Singh
- M – Tyron Whitten (One Nation)
- N – Jason Meotti (Legalise Cannabis Party)
- O – Michael Anagno (Animal Justice)
- P – Megan Krakouer (Australia’s Voice)
- Q – Liberal
- R – Paul Brown (Nationals)
- Ungrouped
-
- Ky Cao (Independent)
- Kim Mubarak (Independent)
-
Assessment
The left did remarkably well to win four senate seats in Western Australia in 2022 and it’s unlikely that will be repeated, but they should be in a position to retain the two Labor and one Greens seats up for grabs.
It’s worth noting that One Nation, not the Liberal Party, came closer to winning a third right seat in 2022. If the Liberal Party remains weak in the west but Labor’s support dips a little, One Nation could be in the box seat to pick up a seat.
Any retirement talk for Linda Reynolds?
not reltaed but are you covering the US election Raue?
Nope.
@John plenty of forums will be covering it. The Republican primary in New Hampshire is tomorrow btw, as are the first Democratic primaries in Iowa.
@np I will say after she loses NH Haley will bow out before super tuesday
Linda Reynolds has announced her retirement today. Spares the party what could have been a bruising preselection battle.
I think the senate make-up will remain status quo and the senators up for reflection will all be reeelected. The only outlier might t be pocock if the libs can claw back enough votes.
So a liber win would not work as the greens and Labor could still block legislation in the senate as they control 38 votes so it would be impossible to govern. Though they would have a chance in 2028 to tip the balance back if they can retake the seat in wa or qld or both.
So the nsw govt wants fairer redistribution of gst on a per person basis this would disadvantage wa on the current arrangemtn and would sink the albanese govt in wa. As the smaller states wa nt tas are effectively predicted up by better gst arrangements
@John SA is also smaller than WA and the ACT and NT are territories. But of course they still pay taxes.
yea but WA is the state that albo doesnt want to lose by cutting their fair share toa per capita basis
Apologies for accidentally using the other thread.
Fatima Payman has quit Labor. She will now sit as an independent.
@Votante pointed out that she’s now the fourth Senator to have quit their party this year. Is that a record?
@John claimed she has Afghan citizenship. While she was born there I don’t think she does. As much as I want her gone she wouldn’t have been able to sit in Parliament if she had dual citizenship.
I would actually support a reform of Section 44 because dual citizenship shouldn’t restrict someone from representing their country of residence provided they’ve lived here for enough time to become a naturalised citizen. If a dual citizen can represent at least two countries in international soccer then surely they should be able to get elected to a parliament.
@ Nether Portal I’ve heard she does apparently have Afghan citizenship, however she took all reasonable steps to relinquish it and was unable to due to the Taliban taking power.
Ben Raue, this is the wrong thread for discussion about Payman as her term does not end in 2025. The discussion in the 2022 thread should not have been closed as it was more pertinent there.
Four senators have quit their parties this term. I think the 2016-2019 term, after the double dissolution election, had more party quitters even when discounting the citizenship/eligibility crisis that saw a number of senators leave. Two of them, Cory Bernadi and Fraser Anning, left their original parties and started their own parties.
It’s not that common for a Labor senator to quit. Relatively speaking, senators from minor parties are more likely to quit or defect.
Wilson, if you feel that way you’re welcome to just not have the conversation. The 2022 election guides don’t just stay open indefinitely. I’ve been happy for people to use them where the new guide hasn’t been published yet, but that’s not the case here. If you want to talk about the Senate races in WA in 2028 you can do those here.
What a dismissive attitude.
It was a silly comment, Wilson.
The 2022 election is finished. The guide is closed. You are perfectly capable of having the conversation here.
Fine, it’s your website, but telling people they’re welcome to just not have the conversation if they disagree with your choices isn’t very nice.
@Ben sorry it was my bad for posting on the other thread. I think I Googled the thread and I got there from Google.
Anyway, can you please do a US open thread?
Also, @Wilson, does it really matter? Come on, the only difference in the title is the last digit of the year.
Also Ben can you open the NSW LGA thread for comments please?
Nether Portal, I simply expressed an opinion. I’m fine with being told no. I’m not fine with someone going past that into telling me to not have a conversation at all. That’s not nice.
Whatever, I’ve said my piece, play on.
Wilson, you are entirely welcome to have your conversation. You just need to do it on the most up-to-date election guide. I don’t want conversations splintered over a decade and a half of election guides. This is an extremely minor request and I was just reminding you that you can go elsewhere if it’s so hard.
Fatima Payman has announced the creation of a new party, Australia’s voice. She claims that it would be for “the disenfranchised and unheard”. The party will mainly be competing with Labor and the Greens.
payman will lose her seat as soon as 2028 comes around its a bit hard nowadays after turnbulls reforms for minor parties to get in in the more populous states. tas, nt and act are an exception due to the lower quotas
@Darcy probably just another Labor/Greens puppet like the teals so it’s essentially just pro-Palestinian Labor.
It’s so unfortunate that this party is gonna be successful. I really do empathise with the people who got sold this idea of “independents” and real policies by the Greens, the teals and this new party.
The teals are meant to be like moderate Liberals like their voters are but if you look at the teals’ voting record you’ll find they’re just Labor/Greens puppets. They all seem to vote with the Greens at least 75% of the time. They represent rich electorates in the inner-city and think they’re in touch but in reality they aren’t, they’re out of touch with everyone.
Putting this here until the seat profile is created. Bullwinkel is very similar to the seat proposed by the Liberal party which means they likely think they can win it
the Nationals are running a candidate for the Senate this time so id say we will likely get 2 Labor 2 Liberal 1 Green and 1 National
John, the poster above, that seems plausible prediction even if the Nationals get a low primary vote. This is because of the recovering Liberal vote and the subsequent preferences directed to them. There is also the crop of right-wing micro parties that will be quite Nationals-friendly. I can see micro parties putting the Nationals ahead of the Liberals.
Another possible result is ALP 2, LIB 3, GRN 1. It’s very unlikely Labor will get their third senator.
@votante the nats do usually poll quite well especially in the regions and haven’t previously run senate candidates and the nats can target there resources at their senate candidate and bulllwinkel whereas the libs have to spread theirs
John, the Nationals just ran in Durack but not O’Connor nor Forrest last election so it was difficult to gauge their popularity in the regions where there were incumbent Liberal MPs.
It depend how well the lnp vote recovers and if the nats vote is strong enough to get them in a contest for the seat. Expect the nats to dump resources at it though. Labor won’t get a 3 Rd senator a second time.they never expected a 3rd senator last time. PAyman was just a token nomination and a surprise winner
John: the Nats usually run senate candidates in WA – 2022 was the first time in ages when they haven’t. They’ve only cracked 5% once in the recent past, in 2013 (which they then couldn’t back up in the 2014 re-do). Last time before then was the 1987 double dissolution (the “Joh for PM” election), when they got 5.5% (0.7 quotas) and missed out on the last seat behind the Democrats and Jo Vallentine. Apart from that, they haven’t got close.
In 2022 the Libs got 3% beyond a second quota, and One Nation got 3.5%, so the Nats have that to chase down even before considering a swing to the Libs in Perth. Plus, they’re also competing with Christians, Shooters, Clive Palmer and whichever other assorted fruits and nuts try their luck for right-wing seat #3.
Anyway, the Nats are gonna be flat out with the state election, running in unwinnable Perth seats in an attempt to get more than two upper house seats. Any money / time / effort they have left for the federal election will be largely spent in Bullwinkel.
there was a newspoll in WA sowing voter sentiment.
35% say labor deserve relection
50% saying give someone else a go
15% uncommited
if the 15% is splt evenly that gives us 42.5-57.5
it should be noter this was a poll conducted against “an empty chair” so it doesnt mean the lib vote is necesarily 57.5 it just means someone other then labor. obviously some of this vote would go the libs, grns and other minor parties and independents and bring that result back away from the libs in 2pp terms
the greens announcement that they are gonna cut gas prjects is probably gonna hurt them and labor here in WA. while it may not directly effect them there are people in perth whose jobs rely on the indsutry.
the WA state election this week wil likely give us a good idea how WA will swing federally. NP are you able to calculate federal seat results based on state seats?
I’m not so sure that’s the case, there will be a sizeable chunk of voters who go Labor at the state level but are not committed federally. I think a Demos Au poll had it at about 1 in 5 Federal liberal voters are intending to vote Labor on Saturday
@maxim agree but if the labor vote tanks in seats that overlap federal seats especially labor ones that will likely be seen as a judgement on federal labor being taken out against state labor. in victoria its the opposite people are punishing the federal govt for state problems