Ben is joined by Stewart Jackson and Phoebe Hayman to discuss the role of the Greens in the federal election: the seats they are defending and are challenging for, the rivalry between Labor and the Greens and how the electoral system shapes their relationship. The seat of the week is Wills, in the inner north of Melbourne.
This podcast is supported by the Tally Room’s supporters on Patreon. If you find this podcast worthwhile please consider giving your support.
You can listen to an ad-free version of this podcast if you sign up via Patreon for $8 or more per month. And $8 donors can now join the Tally Room Discord server.
You can subscribe to this podcast using this RSS feed in your podcast app of choice, but should also be able to find this podcast by searching for “the Tally Room”. If you like the show please considering rating and reviewing us on iTunes.
Interesting and it will be an interesting election for all parties. Will we see the continual decline of the major parties, or will the Greens just fade away.
For me, who generally vote Greens for tactical purposes, I would like to see a greater maturity of the Greens evolve. While there are some green shoots in this area, I still can’t see enough of this to for my desired growth from adolescence to adulthood.
My personal preference in political terms is for politicians to take a problem solving approach to issues – identify the core issue and then work to identify options that are within their jurisdiction and control to address. Unfortunately all parties don’t take this approach and tend to take an ideological / vested interest approach and then play around the margins, with the end result being you never really get to solve the real root cause of the problem (e.g housing affordability). While I can’t see them doing it, maybe this is something that the Greens can focus on the future to help broader their appeal. But that will mean ditching some of their existing core base, but possibly pick up a greater number of centralist voters.
At present the Greens remind me of the fatal flaw that the Democrats fell into at the last US Election – they focus too much on niche issues, but ignore the central issues that are of concern to the greater majority. I think their strategy on focusing on renters was smart, tactically, but possibly not the winner they think it will be.
Personally I would vote for a Teal like candidate in a heartbeat, as I see them generally having the level of maturity that I desire. Unfortunately I am not in an electorate that has that option.
I love elections because for me they give me a sense of the heartbeat of the nation at that point in time. As I said in a previous post, I don’t like any of the major party options, but whether this is just me or a wider opinion, I would be interested to see. My gut feeling is that the Greens will go backwards this election and there may be an up-tick in independents votes (but possibly not seats) in the lower house and who knows what in the upper house.
Sorry but the commentary above on Greens seems like so much divorced from reality and just repeating various tropes without any evidence
Greens main policy platforms relate directly to major and significant issues on many people’s minds and concerns. Housing, accessing healthcare including costs and availability of services. General cost of living, climate and environmental concerns.
It seems just incredibly shallow often evidence free views that dominate Aust political discourse
Labor are Lib/Nats run tedious negative ads and carry on like children demanding it’s their way or the highway, even if more than a third of voters vote for neither of them and neither of the duopoly will muster a majority of primary votes again.
Greens are putting out detailed policy positions and clearly stating working for better outcomes is the point. Usually ignored or attacked through total BS stories.
The duopoly parties are captured by vested interests and continually fail to do anything but tinker and pander to those donors and interests.
If polling is correct more Australians will vote for Greens in the coming election than have ever done so before. Despite millions of dollars and BS thrown around by those vested interests to attack Greens and the major political party tropes which so many just mindlessly repeat, ad nauseum.
All the tropes seem like a poor effort to justify keeping the mediocrity of Australian politics rolling along and doing nothing actually useful. Just accept the same crap for ever.
As for independents, no social change or movement was ever a product of a bunch of egos or individuals. Only a social or political movement, electoral or otherwise, that can act together and promote a cohesive platform or intention has ever really changed anything. I actually find it remarkable how naive some seem to have become about how basic social and political power operates. A bunch of disparate individuals cannot produce any cohesive social or political change. If they are not a bunch of disparate individuals are they really independents?
I 100% agree Quoll.
Living in Macnamara myself, I constantly read about how the Greens being “solely focused” on Palestine will hurt them, I receive attack flyers from the Libs and Advance calling them extremists, and even in the Jewish community debate the other night – which the Greens candidate wasn’t invited to – the ALP incumbent, LIB candidate and all the moderators and people asking questions just spoke about the Greens being anti-Semitic and focused on extremist issues as if it were fact.
The actual reality I see out there in a seat the Greens are extremely visible in, are the Greens focusing almost exclusively on cost of living, the rental crisis, housing affordability, childcare access, Medicare and environment. Not just on posters, leaflets and the policies they are promoting on social media, but they actually host renters’ rights workshops, baby clothes swap meets, beach cleanups, have been lobbying to save a childcare centre and build a primary school hall…
It’s a case where if certain opponents backed by the media just say something (“The Greens are extremists”) enough times, it becomes a reality for people which isn’t based in fact.
Agree Trent and Quoll, living in a Greens seat myself (Brisbane) I have noticed that Steven Bates doesn’t seem to be the extremist type compared to Adam Bandt, Max Chandler Mather or even Jono Sririnigathan. He focuses on the core issues (such as rental affordability) and also hosts frequent community BBQ’s.
Well Quoll, Trent and Yoh An, we will all just have to wait until the election results roll in, because they are the only real hard core evidence we can all definitely rely on. The rest is just reading the tea leafs and offering opinions, such as what I was doing from my perspective.
You might have missed the part where I vote 1 Greens, but I still have some concerns with their policies. When you look at them, most of their big spending initiatives come down to “taxing multi-national corporations more”. While I agree with the sentiment, it does appear to this little black duck to be quite simplistic and verging on populism in terms of actually funding these spending initiatives. If taxing multi-national corporations more was so easy and popular, surely it would have been done before now, given all parties and governments around the world are facing a revenue problem in this day and age.
I worked as a town planner and while the Greens Housing Policy is better that the two majors, it still falls well short of addressing the core issues associated with this wicked problem, which was what I was trying to highlight in my original comment. If the Greens actually tried to address these core issues in a substantive way, then maybe, just maybe they will gain more credibility and votes, much like they have done in Germany.
Too be perfectly honest Neil, I would say that the German Greens are the last party that the Australian Greens should be seeking to emulate. Their recent result was a 6% loss of primary and a loss of over 30 seats in the Bundestag.
I think the “Major Minor Progressive parties” in the world are in a really interesting position these days, and I’m watching the Canadian Election with a lot of interest, where it seems that the NDP is about to cop a flogging as well. It’s also worth pointing out that although UK Labour have been increasingly unpopular, that hasn’t really translated into support for the UK Greens it seems. An outlier here is probably the French New Popular Front, but I’m not going to pretend to have much of an understanding of that grouping.
I don’t see these sorts of things translating to the Australian Landscape yet, but it’s something that the Australian Greens should be mindful of.
My feeling is that the Greens will probably hold their ground this election, but probably will not have enough gains to significantly change their current number of seats (they may loose a couple and/or gain a couple but I’d guess they will end up in net the same position). I’m not super convinced its much to do with the Greens themselves necessarily, but the realpolitik that a lot of swing progressive voters may vote teal/Labor for strategic purposes to avoid Dutton, rather than taking issue with the Greens. I don’t think the Advance Australia stuff is landing with anyone other than people who already hated the Greens.
I think the Greens lost a year of momentum over the Palestine issue. They were keeping up their work in parliaments and councils but nearly all of their political capital from October 2023 to a bit before the Qld election was being spent on Palestine. It is detached from the kitchen table issues focus the Greens had successfully pivoted to. I do think it turned off some by openly picking one side of a very messy and violent conflict shaped by an attack on civilians by a terrorist organisation, and usually comes with campus socialist vibes. For example Huong Truong is a very strong candidate in Fraser but her recent speech to the Palestine rally sounded like something you tune out walking between lectures.
The Greens have, as predicted, got their focus back closer to the federal election, and anyone following the Israel/Palestine issue would see Israel flouting the ceasefire deal and entertaining Trump’s visions for Gaza. So their focus looks somewhat prescient and their activities in 2024 likely won them volunteers going door to door talking about renters rights and dental in Medicare.
Moving ahead the Greens will need to make the case that being an organised political party is a good thing. They may have accepted losing the small l seats to teals, but left wing Fremantle is a seat where Greens should not have expected to be outdone by an independent. In the ACT I’m getting the sense the winnable voters genuinely prefer the Pocock/Emerson style of politics to the Greens and it’s an existential threat.
There were a couple of issues where the teals got pittances while the Greens extracted strong reforms in the last parliament, but that didn’t seem to cut through as much as the narrative the Greens were obstinate blockers. I think the key to success is that the Greens function across all 3 tiers of government. Their activity on council gets mostly overlooked outside BCC and there hasn’t been good evidence of coordinated interstate policy. With the breakthrough in the NT, they now have the capability to push state level initiatives nationwide – they should use it
@Westside Finch, thanks for your comment.
I really don’t follow Green politics overseas, but I just recall a throw away comment recently made by Hammish McDonald on his podcast Global Roaming about the German Greens joining in a minority government and they did a complete backflip on their previous policy position. All this goes to reinforce my view that governing is never easy and once you are sitting at the big table you have to make real life decisions that have consequences. This backflip probably goes to your point about them losing votes next time around – the true believers were not happy!
This was partly my point about developing a more mature policy / problem solving approach. Populism only gets you so far, but if you get elected, then you have to face these choices / consequences (i.e. Trump).
In my job it was ALWAYS a case of making choices between different outcomes and ultimately you have to jump one way or the other. We were always creating winners and losers and I often used to say that if governing choices were so easy – then no sensible government would have ignore them beforehand. The truth is there is rarely easy choices when governing, but many people think it is so easy and black or white.
We lack a political class across the board that can articulate the problem and state the reasons why they took the decision they did. We might not like that decision, but if we can see beyond our own blind spots then we might just appreciate the magnitude of the problem and devilish choices and consequences that need to be made.
The Greens definitely face the problems of being an established political party with an activist base. This has only been growing because as they remain an embedded feature of the political landscape over the years, they’ve been seen more and more as part of the mainstream rather than outsiders. The leadership seem to be induced to respond to this activist base to maintain the donations/volunteers, particularly when an election isn’t imminent, but that puts them offside to the broader electorate by appearing offside. I’m thinking in particular of Palestine and fights over “transphobia” in the VIC Greens as moments when they are unable to maintain a focus on bread and butter issues because of being driven by an activist base.