SA redistribution finalised

3

South Australia’s Electoral Districts Boundaries Commission published the final version of the state redistribution yesterday, to come into effect at the next state election in March 2026.

Compared to the draft redistribution, the EDBC has generally made the changes even more minimalistic, reversing changes in a number of areas. 27 seats had been untouched on the draft. On the final maps, 30 seats will be left unchanged. The draft moved 3.5% of voters to a new seat – that is now just 3.3%.

The changes in the Adelaide area were already minor but the map shows a bunch of seats in Adelaide have been put back as they were.

Changes between Black, Gibson and Morphett have been reversed, while changes between Black, Reynell and Hurtle Vale have been modified. Changes between Croydon and West Torrens have also been reversed. Changes in the northern outskirts of Adelaide have been left alone.

Outside of Adelaide, there have been some more substantial changes. The seat of Frome has been renamed Ngadjuri. The seat has shifted south to be closer to Gawler on the northern outskirts of Adelaide, but no further changes to the boundary have taken place since the draft was published.

The other major change was to the area of central South Australia that runs from Giles north-west to the WA and NT borders. This enormous area is sparsely populated but does include over 5,000 voters. Quite a few of these voters would live in the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara, or APY, lands in the north-western corner of the state.

These areas were contained in the Whyalla-based seat of Giles in 2022, but the addition of the second half of Port Augusta meant Giles needed to lose this area. The draft added this area to the seat of Flinders, which covers Port Lincoln and a majority of the SA coastline. But on the final boundaries, it has been added to independent Geoff Brock’s seat of Stuart, which now stretches from New South Wales to Western Australia. Stuart was already undergoing a significant redrawing as it has lost the remainder of Port Augusta. On the draft, 27.9% of Stuart’s electors were new. On the final map, that number is 35.6%.

Just nine seats have undergone changes between the draft and final boundaries, so the changes to margins are subtle. They make no difference to the swings needed for Labor to lose its majority or for the Liberal Party to gain a majority (ignoring any defections or by-election changes).

The biggest change in margin between the draft and the final was Black. The pre-redistribution margin was 2.7%, and it was cut to 1.1% on the draft redistribution, and it has now bounced back to 2.7%. Of course this doesn’t consider the recent Black by-election, which Labor won with a 9.9% margin.

I estimate that the addition of extra areas in Stuart has increased Geoff Brock’s very safe margin from 16.4% to 17.0%, although this is still less than the 17.1% result in 2022.

The Labor margin in Morphett has also reverted back to its election margin of 4.5%, after the draft increased the margin to 5.1%.

That’s it for now – I’ll be looking to find the time to prepare my guide to the 2026 South Australian state election in early 2025.

Margin estimates

Seat Old margin New margin
Adelaide 6.2% ALP 6.2% ALP
Badcoe 14.8% ALP 14.8% ALP
Black 2.7% LIB 2.7% LIB
Bragg 8.2% LIB 8.2% LIB
Chaffey 17.2% LIB 17.2% LIB
Cheltenham 19.1% ALP 19.1% ALP
Colton 4.8% LIB 4.8% LIB
Croydon 24.8% ALP 24.8% ALP
Davenport 3.4% ALP 3.4% ALP
Dunstan 0.5% LIB 0.5% LIB
Elder 5.6% ALP 5.6% ALP
Elizabeth 20.5% ALP 21.3% ALP
Enfield 14.5% ALP 14.5% ALP
Finniss 0.7% LIB vs IND 0.7% LIB vs IND
Flinders 3.0% LIB vs IND 3.0% LIB vs IND
Florey 12.8% ALP 12.8% ALP
Gibson 2.5% ALP 2.5% ALP
Giles 21.0% ALP 17.3% ALP
Hammond 5.1% LIB 5.1% LIB
Hartley 3.6% LIB 3.6% LIB
Heysen 1.9% LIB 2.8% LIB
Hurtle Vale 15.5% ALP 15.6% ALP
Kaurna 20.1% ALP 19.8% ALP
Kavel 25.4% IND vs LIB 26.3% IND vs LIB
King 2.9% ALP 3.9% ALP
Lee 11.2% ALP 11.5% ALP
Light 19.5% ALP 20.1% ALP
MacKillop 22.6% LIB 22.6% LIB
Mawson 13.8% ALP 13.8% ALP
Morialta 1.4% LIB 1.4% LIB
Morphett 4.5% LIB 4.5% LIB
Mount Gambier 13.1% IND vs LIB 13.1% IND vs LIB
Narungga 8.3% IND vs LIB 8.0% IND vs LIB
Newland 5.4% ALP 5.4% ALP
Ngadjuri (Frome) 8.1% LIB 3.4% LIB
Playford 16.3% ALP 16.3% ALP
Port Adelaide 21.8% ALP 21.8% ALP
Ramsay 19.9% ALP 19.9% ALP
Reynell 16.7% ALP 17.3% ALP
Schubert 11.9% LIB 11.9% LIB
Stuart 17.1% IND vs LIB 17.0% IND vs LIB
Taylor 19.7% ALP 18.7% ALP
Torrens 10.0% ALP 10.0% ALP
Unley 2.2% LIB 2.2% LIB
Waite 4.0% ALP 4.0% ALP
West Torrens 18.8% ALP 18.8% ALP
Wright 11.9% ALP 12.0% ALP

Primary vote estimates

Seat ALP prim LIB prim GRN prim IND prim
Adelaide 40.6 39.8 13.5 6.1
Badcoe 50.0 29.2 11.4 9.4
Black 38.2 50.1 11.8 0.0
Bragg 28.6 53.8 12.6 5.0
Chaffey 19.9 54.6 6.0 19.4
Cheltenham 55.6 24.4 10.9 9.2
Colton 36.8 52.3 10.9 0.0
Croydon 60.8 22.5 12.3 4.4
Davenport 40.8 41.2 9.4 8.6
Dunstan 35.2 46.7 13.7 4.4
Elder 43.4 38.1 9.9 8.6
Elizabeth 55.3 18.9 7.8 18.0
Enfield 52.3 29.2 10.0 8.5
Finniss 22.9 43.1 6.8 27.2
Flinders 13.9 46.0 4.7 35.4
Florey 48.9 28.4 10.3 12.4
Gibson 39.6 42.6 11.1 6.8
Giles 51.0 18.5 3.8 26.6
Hammond 23.3 40.5 6.1 30.1
Hartley 37.4 51.0 11.6 0.0
Heysen 25.5 42.2 19.7 12.6
Hurtle Vale 54.0 26.4 8.3 11.3
Kaurna 55.9 21.1 10.9 12.1
Kavel 14.7 20.0 8.1 57.1
King 43.9 38.7 5.7 11.8
Lee 51.3 33.7 8.5 6.4
Light 57.5 23.1 6.8 12.5
MacKillop 20.0 62.3 0.0 17.6
Mawson 51.2 28.0 8.9 12.0
Morialta 36.1 46.2 10.3 7.4
Morphett 35.6 51.7 12.7 0.0
Mount Gambier 20.6 29.0 0.0 50.4
Narungga 20.0 30.0 0.0 50.0
Newland 36.9 34.6 5.8 22.8
Ngadjuri 30.7 41.2 0.6 27.6
Playford 53.5 24.7 9.5 12.3
Port Adelaide 58.4 22.6 10.1 8.9
Ramsay 60.0 21.4 7.2 11.4
Reynell 54.6 24.0 11.0 10.4
Schubert 22.7 51.4 10.2 15.6
Stuart 18.7 31.9 2.5 46.9
Taylor 52.6 21.9 6.0 19.6
Torrens 48.6 33.6 10.6 7.2
Unley 32.0 49.2 18.7 0.0
Waite 26.6 25.9 11.4 36.1
West Torrens 54.9 27.9 17.2 0.0
Wright 51.9 31.9 8.4 7.9
Liked it? Take a second to support the Tally Room on Patreon!
Become a patron at Patreon!

3 COMMENTS

  1. i find that offensive to be honest. all the guy did was punish the people who murdered 26 survivors of a shipwreck and burnt an abandoned village after the inhabitants ran away after commiting the crimes. and then now they name it after people who own part of the native title of the area it now occupies what happens when the boundaries shift again.

  2. in fact he was never participated in the revenge killings so i dont see the problem. just a case of wanting to trash another white mans name

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here