I’ve recently completed an update of my candidate list for the Victorian state election, and I’m now publishing the list for the first time. The list now includes 296 Legislative Assembly candidates and 89 Legislative Council candidates in 61 separate groups across the 8 regions.
There are an average of 3.3 candidates per seat, but that’s bound to increase. There are six seats where only one candidate has announced: Bendigo West, Bundoora, Gippsland East, Malvern, Murray Plains and Ovens Valley. There are another four where six candidates have announced: Albert Parks, Broadmeadows, Morwell and Pascoe Vale.
The most interesting feature of the data is the very high proportion of candidates who are women.
There were 507 lower house candidates in 2018. 322 of those candidates were men, 184 were women and one I wasn’t able to identify. That’s at least 36.3% women.
Right now, 54.4% of all lower house candidates are women. That’s 161 women, 134 men and one non-binary candidate.
Now that list is not complete, but it’s a very interesting shift. When you break down the gender balance by party, most parties have a larger proportion of female candidates than in 2018.
The current list includes 76 Labor candidates, 32 candidates each for the Greens and Animal Justice, 22 Victorian Socialists candidates, and 6 Reason Party candidates. There’s definitely a lean to the left amongst minor party candidates, but there are also five candidates each for the Liberal Democrats and the Freedom Party.
There are 72 Liberal candidates and 10 Nationals candidates running across 77 seats – there are five seats where both parties are running: Bass, Euroa, Mildura, Morwell and Shepparton.
In terms of gender balance by party, the Nationals are steady on 40% women and the Liberal Party is down slightly to 32%. All of the parties of the left have currently announced a higher proportion of women than they ran in 2018: the Socialists, Reason, Animal Justice, Labor and the Greens. Almost 60% of Labor and Greens candidates are women.
The biggest change, however, is amongst independents. So far 32 independents have announced their candidacy, compared to 102 in 2018. Only 28 out of 102 were women, but 23 out of 32 announced this year are women, plus one person identified as non-binary. That’s three quarters of all the independents.
I’m going to return to analysing the list of independents in another blog post, but looking through the websites of the candidates you very clearly see a similar trend to what we saw in the federal election: a lot of women running with professional websites. Of course that doesn’t mean we’ll see the same kind of results – but the same forces that encouraged that big wave of candidates is also playing out in Victoria.
I’ve noticed one other interesting trend: surprisingly few Labor candidates have websites or any web presence at all. When I’m seeking out web addresses for candidates, I prefer a personal website, but I fall back to a profile on their party website (a page dedicated to that one candidate), or a Facebook page if neither of those things are available.
The Liberal Party and the Greens have party websites with profiles for each candidate. It seems like pretty much every Liberal candidate, including those running in very safe Labor seats, has their own website, bare as they may be. There are just 3 recently announced Greens candidates with no website presence, and no Liberals in that position. Yet there are 11 Labor candidates with nothing, and another 19 for whom I could only find a Facebook page.
Labor incumbent MPs generally have their own websites, but for the 40 non-incumbent Labor candidates in the lower house, I’ve found websites for just eight. There is no central website with profiles for each candidate. This includes candidates with a very high chance of winning: a number of safe seat MPs were deselected, and often their successors have no website.
Does it matter? Maybe not. But it seems interesting that this infrastructure isn’t in place, less than two months out from election day.
I have had been doing a quick analysis of the Published Donations in Victoria. All cumulative donations of greater than $1080 to the maximum of $4320 have to be published in Victoria. So these amounts are only the sum of the large donations and is not the total money raised.
Of the parties the figures are:
AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY – VICTORIAN BRANCH $917,638
LIBERAL PARTY OF AUSTRALIA – VICTORIAN DIVISION $600,208
VICTORIAN SOCIALISTS $86,628
THE AUSTRALIAN GREENS – VICTORIA $84,352
NATIONAL PARTY OF AUSTRALIA – VICTORIA $61,160
FIONA PATTEN’S REASON PARTY $34,460
ANIMAL JUSTICE PARTY $20,363
TRANSPORT MATTERS PARTY $14,111
Victorians Party $6,990
LIBERAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY $4,000
Sustainable Australia Party – Stop Overdevelopment / Corruption $2,000
HEALTH AUSTRALIA PARTY $1,500
What I find interesting is that the Victorian Socialists have out raised the Greens and the Nationals in large published donations. Despite all the talk about the Victorian Party by the media, their fund raising has not seen much large scale support.
Of the Independent and lobby groups the figures are:
Kew 500 Club 101000.00
Kate Lardner 86055.00
KEW INDEPENDENTS PTY LTD 84057.00
Hawthorn Independents 69426.00
Climate 200 Pty Ltd 56140.00
Jacqui Hawkins 15998.00
Rochel Nomi Kaltmann 11140.00
Ian Cook 6672.99
Ali Cupper 4500.00
Kew 500 Club was I think Tim Smith’s slush fund and has not received any new donations since Tim took offence (a fence) in November and lost preselection.
Kate Lardner in Mornington is raking in the big bucks.
Hawthorn Independents are backing Melissa Lowe as independent in Hawthorn.
Jacqui Hawkins is an independent in Benambra (which is in the federal seat of Indi held by Helen Haines).
Rochel Nomi Kaltmann is running as a “teal” in Caulfield.
Ian Cook is the guy from the “slug saga” running in Mulgrave against Dan Andrews.
Ali Cupper is the independent member for Mildura.
There are some others but they all have only the maximum amount or less.
Can Will Fowles be considered the incumbent in Ringwood when he has been parachuted in as his old seat of Burwood was abolished?
Why no Labor candidates listed in the LC portion of the spreadsheet?
Because I haven’t seen any Labor candidates officially announced.
Thank you.
https://www.thisislabor.org/members-update/#confirmed-candidates
Full list of upper house and almost every lower house candidate available here.
Thanks. I’ve noted that, I’ll probably do my next update next week.
@Ham, @Ben Raue
Where do lobby groups obtain .xls data of all candidates, with contact email info, to survey their policy opinions?
Any help or ideas would be appreciated.
Comments are closed.